Starbucks must submit the necessary documents the Department of Labor (DOL) needs to determine their compliance with the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act.
This is the decision made by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on Oct. 4 after DOL issued a subpoena to Starbucks, seeking documents needed in an investigation by the department’s Office of Labor-Management Standards into money spent by the company related to worker organizing campaigns. The employer refused to abide by the subpoena.
“The Court finds that the Acting Secretary has properly demonstrated that she has authority to investigate; (2) that her delegates properly followed procedure in issuing the Subpoena; and (3) that the information sought is relevant and material to the investigation,” said United States Senior District Judge Marsha J. Pechman in the decision.
“Additionally, the request is reasonable. The Court GRANTS the Acting Secretary’s Petition to Enforce.”
Pechman gave Starbucks 14 days to comply with the subpoena.
In August, Starbucks’ challenge to a ruling requiring it to reinstate seven fired workers was denied. The Ohio-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion noting that Starbucks’ firing of the seven workers was an act of retaliation for their unionizing efforts.
The subpoena seeks documents “documents related to travel expenditures Starbucks may have paid to send [former CEO] Howard Schultz, corporate officers, and managers . . . to Buffalo, travel agendas, records related to meetings that the individuals who traveled held with employees in Buffalo, and records related to any bonuses Starbucks paid to employees and officers who traveled to Buffalo”.
The subpoena also requests records of any expenditures Starbucks made to create and maintain a website addressing the union organizing and job descriptions of the individuals who traveled to Buffalo.
